There are plenty, it turns out, of technically minded home music enthusiasts that use iTunes. Such people, I reckoned, were DIYers who wanted to construct a home music network from parts and would be likely to reject limitations imposed by Apple's tight vertical integration.Īs the months and years have gone by it has become increasingly clear that my perception of the market was overly specialised. When I started out writing bliss I just envisaged a tool for people like me, where "people like me" was a necessarily small niche of computer music enthusiasts. I understand that seems an odd choice given iTunes is by far the most used software music player on the market, and is the "portal" through which much of the Apple music ecosystem is accessed. It's apparent you feel the same way It's true that I've prioritised other developments above an iTunes integration. I've had it in mind for a long time that bliss's interoperability with iTunes is not what it could be. The basic structure of the user interface is similar though, so I'm keeping these old pages around in case they still contain useful information. This post may contain old screenshots of bliss which has been replaced by a new design.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |